Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Raul Brancaccio vs Harold Mayot Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brancaccio vs Mayot analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Raul Brancaccio vs Harold Mayot Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Brancaccio 1 - 0 Mayot
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brancaccio has won 44.08% of points on their second serve, while Mayot has won 51.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brancaccio, in recent form, has won 51.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mayot has won 49.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34% and 30.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brancaccio has saved 60.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mayot has saved 66.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brancaccio has won 44.23% of matches played (W/L 23/ 29), with Mayot winning 56.16% (W/L 41/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brancaccio has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 57/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Mayot has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 9/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 40/ 39).
- Player level: In the last year, Brancaccio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 20/ 24), where as Mayot has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 24/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brancaccio winning 1 times and Mayot being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Brancaccio winning 2 and Mayot winning 0. The last match between Brancaccio and Mayot was at the M25 Prague, 15-09-2020, First, Clay with Raul Brancaccio getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brancaccio and Mayot have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brancaccio winning 0 times and Mayot 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Brancaccio winning 0, and Mayot 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brancaccio has played against opponents with an average rank of 335.62 while Mayot has played against players with an average rank of 253.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brancaccio has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mayot has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brancaccio has converted 45.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mayot has converted 47.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
377
Rank
121
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
113
Rank
112
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
58% (329-239)
Career Total W/L
55% (143-118)
44% (12-15)
YTD W/L
57% (28-21)
$119,520
Career Prize Money
$160,570
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Raul Brancaccio vs Harold Mayot For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Brancaccio VS Mayot
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Brancaccio VS Mayot H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Raul Brancaccio | Harold Mayot |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:0 | 1:33:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (36/64) | 54% (38/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (23/36) | 53% (20/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (12/28) | 44% (14/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (36/70) | 45% (29/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Brancaccio VS Mayot H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Harold Mayot
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
8
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Raul Brancaccio | Harold Mayot |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (12/15) | 57% (28/21) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (29/36) | 56% (62/49) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (296/306) | 53% (563/503) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 64% (9/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 53% (10/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (4/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.52 |
| Aces Total | 69 | 272 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 140 | 146 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:13 | 1:39:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 363.19 | 229.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1176/1936) | 61% (2092/3443) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (805/1176) | 70% (1470/2092) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (335/760) | 52% (700/1351) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (86/191) | 48% (134/280) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (806/1971) | 38% (1263/3306) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (10/13) | 62% (16/10) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (12/27) | 60% (27/45) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 44% (8/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 46% (6/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 88% (26/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 31% (13/4) | 12% (26/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 17% (23/4) |
Raul Brancaccio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Raul Brancaccio
45%
(
37 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
9
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
58%
(
61 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
7
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
5
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
36%
(
16 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Raul Brancaccio
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Raul Brancaccio
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Peter Benjamin Privara
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
7
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Raul Brancaccio
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Raul Brancaccio
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
1
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Raul Brancaccio
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Harold Mayot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jiri Vesely
Player
Harold Mayot
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
10
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Harold Mayot
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Lloyd Harris
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Richard Gasquet
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
14
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Emilio Nava
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Harold Mayot
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
3
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Marc Polmans
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Harold Mayot
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Harold Mayot
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Brancaccio Vs Mayot Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Brancaccio are available here and Mayot photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Raul Brancaccio
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
